Library / ARA-261031-D7361A / governance
Worked example: Autonomous loan approval (Australia)
Versions of this assessment, reviewer sign-off, suggested framework mapping, and every linked deliverable.
Sign-off
Sign off version 1 (the latest run). 15 of 15 items are not yet reviewed; the sign-off will record this.
Versions (1)
| Version | Saved (UTC) | Model | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-10-31 06:37:15 | Worked example: prepared in advance, not generated live | f7b8898d2b6b3ed0 |
Client
Item-by-item review
Confirm each AI-drafted risk, threat, regulatory finding and control. 0 of 15 reviewed (0 changed, 0 rejected). "Accepted with changes" needs a note describing the change. The counts are sealed into the sign-off.
Deliverables
| Failure simulations | none |
|---|---|
| Operating envelopes | none |
| ADM inventory entries | none (add) |
| Vendor reviews | none (start) |
Framework mapping (suggested)
Suggested by keyword rules at heading level; verify each mapping against the licensed standard before using it in a statement of applicability or audit.
| Control | ISO/IEC 42001 Annex A | NIST AI RMF | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | OWASP LLM 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-01 Human review of declines and loans above AUD 30,000 | A.9 Use of AI systems | MANAGE | - | LLM06 Excessive Agency |
| C-02 Fairness and affordability testing before release and monthly | A.5 Assessing impacts of AI systems; A.6 AI system life cycle | MEASURE | - | - |
| C-03 Automated-decision transparency | A.2 Policies related to AI; A.8 Information for interested parties of AI systems | GOVERN | 5 Organizational | - |
| C-04 Model change control and fallback | A.6 AI system life cycle | MEASURE | - | - |
Headings with no mapped control
ISO/IEC 42001 Annex A: A.3 Internal organization; A.4 Resources for AI systems; A.7 Data for AI systems; A.10 Third-party and customer relationships
NIST AI RMF: MAP
An uncovered heading is a prompt to check whether a control is needed, not proof of a gap.
Decision support only, not legal or regulatory advice. AI-generated ratings and citations must be reviewed by a qualified person before they are relied on.