Assess an AI use case
Describe a business scenario in plain language. ARA's agents interpret it, then the Risk, Compliance and Security analysts work in parallel. A Control Analyst derives controls and residual risk, and a Supervisor gives an executive decision with a remediation plan.
1. Describe the scenario
What you get
- Scenario Brief: every fact tagged as user-confirmed, AI-inferred or not specified; material gaps; alternative approaches.
- Risk register with likelihood, impact and a heat map.
- Regulatory impact and compliance gaps, grounded in Secure-RAG evidence when connected.
- Security threats: traditional and AI-specific, with MITRE references where confident.
- Controls and residual risk: inherent, then controls, then residual.
- Executive decision with conditions and a 0-30 / 30-90 / 90+ day plan.
- Red team (optional), downloads (Markdown, JSON, findings for CALIBRE Governance Fabric, printable report).
Model configuration
Back end huggingface, model meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct; fallbacks Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct.
Secure-RAG evidence: connected, the Compliance agent receives retrieved passages.
Worked examples (no model needed)
Complete assessments of the four sample scenarios, prepared in advance by the tool author so you can see every page and download without a language model. They are not generated live; regulatory statements are illustrative.
Recent assessments
No assessments yet. Pick a sample above to try ARA.
Decision support only, not legal or regulatory advice. AI-generated ratings and citations must be reviewed by a qualified person before they are relied on.